CUSTOMARY RURAL LAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ETHIOPIA: THE CASE OF SHIMGLINA IN BAHIR DAR ZURIA WOREDA OF AMHARA REGIONAL STATE

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of customary conflict-resolution procedures in rural land dispute settlement in Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda, specifically in the kebeles of Wojer, Feresewoga, Tentakerkose, Sebatamite, and Lejome. To achieve the objectives, the study has adopted a qualitative research approach using a case study research design, incorporating both primary and secondary sources of data. Purposive sampling was used to select informants based on their knowledge and experience in the community regarding the subject of this study. Participants in this study included 91 informants. Using thematic analysis, the data were assessed qualitatively. There are numerous causes, including poverty, a lack of farmland, population growth, rising rural property values, and limited rural land rights, that have been linked to rural land disputes. The study examines the benefits and drawbacks of traditional conflict resolution techniques in Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda, specifically in the kebeles of Wojer, Feresewoga, Tentakerkose, Sebatamite, and Lejome. The objectives of the study are achieved by combining primary and secondary data sources using a case study research design and a qualitative research approach. The administrative system was one of the indirect causes of land disputes in rural areas, which manifested as disagreements over ownership, access, inheritance, and boundaries. The findings of this study also suggested that the Shimglina customary conflict resolution methods played a major role in land dispute resolution, promoting good governance, justice, and the prevention of violence, and were found to be one of the golden cultures for generating peace in society. The government should integrate customary systems into current conflict-resolution processes to address their shortcomings.